Father Annunakis the
a few weeks ago we learned of the death of Russian-born researcher, Zecharia Sitchin. Remember that this scholar, an expert in dead languages, popularized the theory of alien gods, to which he called Anunnaki, based in the distant past in ancient Sumer, modern Iraq today.
Sitchin believed that these space travelers, human life originated on Earth, giving it the power of creator gods.
This central idea captured it in a first work that made him a celebrity worldwide, The 12th Planet, which was followed by a dozen works, which again addressed the subject again and again, convinced of the reality of a saga that thought real up its disappearance. Sometime in
Underground Chronicle talked about the legacy of Sitchin, who writes that, not convinced with her very particular vision of early history, a bit away from the development as it is conceived.
Perhaps a less shared concepts is the development of an idea that the gods intend to give the powers of gods Annunakis absolute responsibility of every civilized culture as is the know today, and to the holding was born in East and then spread to the rest of the planet. Discussed
or not, Sitchin has become a benchmark respected and whose word was echoed among many followers, who adopted his Annunaki as valid historical source, although lack of further evidence.
Beyond these looks do not always coincide, we want to rescue one of the key texts drawn from the 12 th planet, and which are special tune.
is Lulu's birth, man!
The Creation of Man
The statement, signed and transmitted by the Sumerians, that "Man" was created by the Nephilim, appears to conflict at first glance, both with the theory of evolution as with the Judeo-Christian dogmas based on the Bible.
But in fact, the information contained in the Sumerian texts, and only that information, can affirm both the validity of the theory of evolution as the truth of the biblical story, and show that, in reality, there conflict between the two.
In the epic "When the gods as men" in other specific texts and references in passing, the Sumerians described the man not only as a deliberate creation of the gods, but also as a link in the evolutionary chain that began with the celestial events described in the "Epic of Creation." Holding the firm belief that the creation of man was preceded by an era during which only the Nephilim were on Earth, the Sumerian texts recorded on a case by case basis (for example, the incident between Enlil and Ninlil), the events place "when Man had not yet been created, when Nippur was inhabited only by the gods." At the same time, the texts also described the creation Earth and the evolution of plant and animal life in it, and did so in terms that conform to current evolutionary theory.
The Sumerian texts state that when the Nefilim arrived on Earth, yet it had spread the arts of cultivation of cereals and fruit as well as the care of livestock. Similarly, the biblical creation of man lies in the sixth "day" or phase of the evolutionary process. The Book of Genesis says that, in an earlier evolutionary stage:
No plant was still open country on Earth,
any grass that is planted had germinated yet ...
And Man was not yet there to work the soil.
All Sumerian texts say that the gods created Man to do their job. Explained in the mouth of Marduk, the epic of creation accounts for the decision: I breed a Primitivo
humble
"Man" is his name.
I will create a Primitive Worker;
he will pay for the service of the gods,
for them to be comfortable.
The Sumerian and Akkadian terms used to refer to the "Man" speak clearly of their status and their purpose: the Man was a Mu (early), a Mu amelu (primitive worker) a awilum (worker). That Man had been created to serve the gods was not at all shocking or strange idea to the ancients. In biblical times, the deity was "Lord," "Ruler," "King", "Love." The word usually translated as "worship" was, in fact, Avodah (work). The old man gave no biblical "worship" their god; worked for him.
But as the biblical deity (as the gods of the Sumerian accounts) created man, planted a garden and placed man working on it:
And the Lord God took the "Man" and put
in the Garden
of Eden to till it and keep it.
Later, the Bible describes the divine "walking in the garden when the breeze", now that the new being was there to tend the Garden of Eden. So far is this version of what they say about the Sumerian texts that the gods demanded workers, so they can rest and relax?
In Sumerian versions, the decision to create Man was adopted by the Assembly of the gods. Significantly, the book of Genesis, which supposedly celebrates the achievements of one Deity, uses the plural Elohim (literally "deidadej ') to denote "God", and makes us an amazing "comment:
And Elohim said:
" Let us make man in our image, after our likeness
"" Whose
is speaking not singular but plural Deity and who were those "we" in which plural image and likeness plural Man had to be done? The book of Genesis does not give us the answer. Then, when Adam and Eve ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, Elohim a warning to the same anonymous colleagues: "Behold the Man has become like one of us, as to know good and evil."
Since the biblical Creation, like other tales of beginnings in Genesis, comes from Sumerian sources, the answer is obvious. By condensing the many gods in one Supreme Deity, the biblical story is not just a revised version of the Sumerian reports on discussions in the Assembly of Gods.
The Old Testament is striving to make clear that Man was not a god nor was heaven. "The heavens are the Lord of Heaven, Earth Mankind He has given." The new being was called "the Adam" because it was created from the adama, earth, soil of the earth. In other words, Adam was "the Land." Lacking
just some "knowledge" and a period of divine life, the Adam was created in all other aspects of the image (selem) and likeness (dmut) of his (s) Creator (s). The use of both terms in the text was made to leave no doubt that the man was similar to (the) God (s) both physically and emotionally, externally and internally.
In all ancient artistic representations of gods and men, the physical resemblance is obvious. Although the biblical warning against the worship of pagan images gave rise to the idea that the Hebrew God had no image or likeness, Genesis, as well as other reports biblical testifies to the contrary. The God of the ancient Hebrews could see face to face, he could fight with him, he could hear and speak, had the head and feet, hands and fingers, including waist. The biblical God and his emissaries men looked and acted like men, because men were created in the likeness of the gods and acted as the gods.
But this simple thing lies a great mystery. How does a new baby might be physically, mentally and emotionally, a virtual replica of the Nephilim? Really, how was Man created?
The Western world had long been given to the idea that deliberately created Man had been put on earth to subdue and exercise dominion over all other creatures. Then, in November 1859, a British naturalist named Charles Darwin published a treatise called On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favou-Races in the Struggle Network for Life. Summarizing nearly thirty years of research, the book added to the previous concepts of natural evolution, the idea of \u200b\u200bnatural selection as a result of the struggle of all species, both plants and animals-for existence.
The Christian world had already taken a blow when, from 1788 on, leading geologists had begun to express his belief that the Earth was of great antiquity, much higher than that of the roughly 5,500 years of Hebrew calendar. But the explosive case was not the concept of evolution as such, previous studies have observed this process, and Greek scholars of the fourth century BC had already collected data on the evolution of animal and plant life.
The terrible bombing of Darwin was the conclusion that all living things, including man, were the product of evolution. Man, contrary to the belief held then, there had been generated spontaneously.
The initial reaction of the Church was violent. But as the scientific facts concerning the true age of the Earth, evolution, genetics and other biological and anthropological studies came to light, criticism of the Church were muted. It seemed that, finally, the very words of the Old Testament were indefensible record of the Old Testament, then how could a God that has no body and is universally alone: \u200b\u200b"Let us make man in our image, after our likeness '"?
But really, we are but" naked apes "? Is that the monkey is not beyond the arm's length, evolutionarily talking? Does the tree shrew is a human being who still stands and has not lost its tail?
As shown at the beginning of this book, modern scientists will have to question the simple theory. Evolution can explain the general course of events that have made life and life forms to develop on Earth, from the simplest single-celled creature to Man. But evolution can not account for the emergence of Homo sapiens, which took place in the overnight, in terms of millions of years evolution requires, and without any evidence of previous stages, which could indicate a gradual change from Homo erectus.
The hominid of the genus Homo is a product of evolution. But Homo sapiens is the product of a sudden event, revolutionary. Inexplicably appeared about 300,000 years ago, millions of years too soon.
experts have no explanation for this. But we do. Sumerian and Babylonian texts if they have it. And the Old Testament as well.
Homo sapiens, the modern man "was created by the ancient gods.
Fortunately, the Mesopotamian texts make a clear statement of the time it was created Man. The story of the hardships and the subsequent mutiny of the Anunnaki us says. 'For 40 periods they suffered the work, day and night ", the long years of hard work the poet dramatized the repetition of verses.
For 10 periods they suffered the toil;
for 20 periods they suffered the toil;
for 30 periods they suffered the toil;
for 40 periods they suffered the toil.
The text uses the term old ma to say "period", and most experts have translated as' year. " But the term connotes "something that is complete, and then repeats itself." For men of the Earth, one year equals one complete orbit Earth around the Sun But, as we have shown, the orbit of the planet of the Nefilim amounted to shar, or 3,600 Earth years. Forty
shar, or 144,000 Earth years, after. Su, arrival, did the Anunnaki said, "Enough!". If the Nefilim arrived on Earth, as we have concluded, around 450,000 years ago, the creation of man must have occurred some 300,000 years ago!
The Nefilim did not create the mammals, primates, or hominids. "The Adam" of the Bible was not the genus Homo, but the being who is our ancestor, the first Homo sapiens. What created the Nephilim is the modern man, as we know it.
The key to understanding this crucial fact in the story in which Enki awaken to inform you that the gods have decided to form a adamu, and that their task is to find a way to do it. By the way, answered Enki:
"The creature whose name you utter
THERE!"
and adds: "Hold on it"-on the creature that already exists, "the image of the gods."
Here, then, is the answer to the puzzle: The Nefilim did not "created" Man of anything, but they took a pre-existing creature and manipulated it to "hold on it "the" image of the gods. "
Man is the product of evolution, but the modern man, Homo sapiens, is the product of the "gods." Well, at some point, about 300,000 years ago, the Nefilim took a man-ape (Homo erectus) and he introduced his own image and likeness.
There is no conflict between evolution and creation stories of the Man in the Middle East. Rather, they explain and complement each other. For without the creativity of the Nephilim, modern man would still have a million years away in the evolutionary tree.
back in time and try to visualize the circumstances and events, as revealed.
The great interglacial stage, which began about 435,000 years, and its warm weather led to proliferate and animal food. Also accelerated the emergence and spread of advanced human-like apes, Homo erectus.
When the Nephilim observe all this wildlife, not only would the dominant mammals but also to primates, including apes would be those human looking. And there is certainly a possibility that some of these bands of Homo erectus who went from here to there, feel fascinated and will come out to watch the igneous objects that rose in the sky. It is even possible that the Nephilim observe, find, and even captured some of these fascinating primates.
that the Nephilim and human-like apes met is something that is attested by several ancient texts. A Sumerian story, which is prime time, says:
When mankind was created,
knew nothing about eating bread,
i knew nothing about putting on clothing;
mouth eating plants, such as sheep ;
drank water from a ditch.
In The Epic of Gilgamesh is also described this being "human" half animal. Here we are told it looked Enkidu, the "born on the steppes" before civilized: Hairy
is his whole body,
fitted on the head with a mane like a woman ...
not know anything about people nor land;
her outfit is like a green field;
eats grass with the gazelles, with wild beasts at the watering
rubs;
with the prolific creatures in the water
his heart delights.
Akkadian text not only describes an animal looking man, also speaks of an encounter with such a being:
Then, a hunter, one who puts traps
stood before him in the trough.
When the hunter saw him, his face was
still ...
The concerns touched his heart, his face darkened, because distress
had entered her womb.
The hunter had something else to fear, after watching 'the wild' this' barbaric depths of the steppe ", because that" savage "also meddled in the affairs of the hunter:
filling holes I had dug, traps dismounted
I had set
beasts and creatures of the steppe had made
slip through my hands.
We can not ask for a better description of a man-ape: a wandering nomad hairy "or know of people or land," dressed in leaves, "as one of the green fields", eating grass and living among animals. However, not without some intelligence, he knows how to remove the traps and filling the holes of the hunter. In other words, protecting his animal friends, prevented hunters were captured by aliens. We found many cylindrical stamps representing the hairy ape-man from his animal friends. (Fig. 149)
Then, in need of labor, and determined to make a Primitive Worker, the Nephilim thought of a custom solution: domesticate the appropriate animal.
The 'animal' was available, but the Homo erectus posed a problem. On the one hand, was too intelligent and savage as to become, well, willingly, into a docile beast of burden. Moreover, not really suited to the work required. Would require some physical changes. Had to be able to grasp and use the tools of the Nephilim, as they walk and bend to replace the gods in the fields and mines. Had to have a "brain" better-not like the gods, but good enough to understand the words, commands and the tasks assigned to it. Needed sufficient intelligence and understanding to be an obedient and useful amelu-a servant.
If, as the evidence: the ancient and modern science seem to confirm, life on Earth life sprouted on the Twelfth Planet, the evolution of the Earth must move the same way it did in the Twelfth Planet. Undoubtedly, had to have mutations, variations, accelerations and delays caused by the different local situations, but the same genetic code, the same "chemistry of life" found in all living beings on Earth had to guide the development of terrestrial life forms in the same general direction followed in the Twelfth Planet.
While observing the various forms of life on Earth, the Nefilim and their chief scientist, Ea, they should not take too long to realize what was happening: in the celestial collision, their planet had seeded the Earth with his own life . Hence, the being who wanted to become worker was indeed similar to the Nephilim, but in a less evolved.
What they needed was not a gradual process of domestication through generations of breeding and selection, but a quick process that allowed the "mass production" of new workers. So he raised the issue with Ea, which immediate response was: "print" the image of the gods on the being who already existed.
Ea
The process recommended to achieve a rapid evolutionary development of Homo erectus was, we believe, genetic manipulation.
now know that the complex biological process by which a living organism will reproduce, creating offspring that resemble their parents, is through the genetic code. All living organisms, from worms to the tree fern or Man-equipped, inside each cell, a set of chromosomes, a tiny little bodies of rod-shaped, which contain all the hereditary information of that particular agency. When the male cell (pollen, sperm) fertilizes the female cell, the two sets of chromosomes combine, then divide to form new cells that have all the hereditary characteristics of the cells of the parents.
Today, artificial insemination is possible, including a female human egg. But the challenge lies in cross-fertilization between different families within the same species and even between different species. Modern science has come a long way since the early development of hybrid grains, the crossing of dogs in Alaska with wolves or 'creation' the mule (the artificial mating of a mare with a donkey), to the ability to manipulate their own reproduction of Man.
The process called cloning (from the Greek klon, twig) applies to animals the same principle followed when cutting a stem of a plant, with it, play other similar plants. This technique, applied to animals, it was shown viable for the first time in England, when Dr. John Gordon replaced the nucleus of a fertilized egg of a frog by the nuclear material of another cell of the same frog. The generation of normal tadpoles showed that the egg came to develop, subdivide and create progeny regardless of where to obtain the set of chromosomes to match.
Experiments of the Institute of Society, Ethics and Life Sciences in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, have shown that already have the necessary techniques for cloning human beings. At present, it is possible to take the nuclear material of any human cell (not necessarily from the sex organs) and, introducing his 23 complete sets of chromosomes in the female egg, conceive and give birth to a person "default." In normal conception, the chromosomes of 'father' and 'mother' to mix, then divide and end in the 23 pairs of chromosomes in a process of combinations fortuitous. But in cloning, the offspring is an exact replica of one set of chromosomes that is not divided. We have already, according to Dr. W. Gaylin, "the awful knowledge to make exact copies of human beings'" an unlimited number of Hitlers, Mozarts or Einsteins (if we had preserved their cell nuclei).
But the art of genetic engineering is not merely a process. Researchers in many countries have perfected a process called "fusion cell" that makes possible to melt instead of combining cell chromosomes within a single cell. As a result of this process, cells of different origins can be cast in a "supercell" keeping within itself the two cores and a double set of paired chromosomes. When this cell divides, the mixing of nuclei and chromosomes can be split according to a different model of each cell before the merger. The result may be the two new cells, each genetically complete, but each with a new set of genetic codes, completely disrupted in relation to which he had in the cells of the parents.
This means that cells which, until now, were living organisms inconsistent-for example, a chicken and a mouse, you can merge to form new cells with new mixes genes that produce new animals that will be neither chickens nor mice, as we know. Further refined the process we may also allow the selection of the characteristics or traits of a lifestyle that is intended to impart to the fused cell or "merged."
This is leading to the broad field of 'genetic transplants. " It is now possible to draw from certain bacteria and insert a specific gene in a human or animal cell, giving the offspring an added feature.
should assume that the Nephilim, who were capable of space travel 450,000 years ago, had be equally advanced in the field of life sciences, if we compare their situation with ours today. We should also assume that they knew the alternatives for which two sets of chromosomes combine preselected to obtain a predetermined genetic and that, if the processes were similar to cloning, cell fusion, gene transplantation or other method unknown to us yet, they should know these processes could take place not only in the laboratory test tube, but also in living organisms.
There is a reference to these mixtures of two sources of life in the ancient texts. According to Berosus, the deity Belo (Mr)-also called Deo (God) - the father of several "terrible beings, which were generated from a double top." They appeared
men with two wings, some with four and two faces. They had one body but two heads, one male, one female. Similarly, had both male and female organs.
Other human figures were seen with goat legs and horns. Some had feet of a horse, others had limbs of a horse behind, but were way ahead of men, looking hippocentaurs. Similarly, there were created man-headed bulls, and dogs with bodies quadruple and tails of fish. Also horses with dogs' heads, men too, and other animals, horse head and body and tail of a fish. In summary, there were creatures with limbs of each animal species ... From all this
images were kept in the temple of Belus in Babylon.
The puzzling details of this story may retain an important truth. It is quite likely that, before resorting to the creation of a being with his own image, the Nefilim attempted to solve the problem with a "servant manufactured" experimenting with alternatives, including the creation of hybrid animal-man-ape. Some of these artificial creatures may have survived by time, but certainly should have been unable to reproduce. It is possible that the enigmatic bull-men and men-lion (sphinx) that adorned the temples of the ancient Near East were not only the product of the imagination of an artist, but actual creatures that come out of the biological laboratory of the Nephilim - failed experiments, commemorated in the form of art and statues. (Fig. 150)
The Sumerian texts also speak of deformed humans created by Enki and the Mother Goddess (Ninhursag) during the course of their efforts to shape a perfect Primitive Worker. In one of the texts is said to Ninhursag, whose task was to "bind the mixture the mold of the gods got drunk and" went to Enki "
" How good and how bad is the body of man?
As dictated by my heart, I can make your destination
good or bad. "
Then, itching, according to this text, but probably unavoidably, as part of the process of trial and error, "Ninhursag created a man who could not hold urine, a woman who could not have children, a being he had no male nor female organs. Together, father of six human beings Ninhursag deformed or deficient. Enki was considered responsible for imperfect creation of a man of weak eyes and shaky hands, sick, impaired liver and heart, as well as other diseases related to old age, etc.
But finally achieved the perfect man, to whom Enki named Adapa; the Bible, Adam, and our experts, Homo sapiens. This being was so similar to the gods, in a text, even goes as far as saying that the Mother Goddess gave his creature, Man, "a skin as the skin of a god"-a soft body and no hair, quite different from the hairy man-ape.
With this final product, the Nefilim were genetically compatible with the daughters of Man, and could they marry and have children by them. But such support could only occur if Man had developed from the same "seed of life," as the Nephilim. And indeed, this is what the ancient texts trying to say.
Man, in the Mesopotamian concept as in the Bible, was made of the mixture of a divine element in the blood of a god or the "essence" of his blood, "and the" clay "of the Earth. And the truth is that the term lulu to be applied to man, but bringing the sense of "primitive" literally meant "one who has been mixed."
Having been asked to give way to a man Mother Goddess "washed his hands, took a pinch of clay, mixed in the desert." (It is fascinating to note here the hygienic precautions taken by the goddess. "He washed his hands." We are also these clinical procedures in other texts of creation.)
The use of "clay" earth mixed with "blood" divine to create the prototype of Man is well established in Mesopotamian texts. In one of them, which tells how Enki asked that 'effected a great work of Wisdom ", to" know how "scientific" claims that Enki had no major problems in carrying out the task of "developing servers for the gods." "Can do!" He announced. And then gave instructions to the Mother Goddess:
"Mix to a core the clay
the basis of the Earth,
-just above the Abzu-
and give the shape of a heart.
I will provide good and intelligent young gods
to take the clay to the proper state. "
The second chapter of Genesis offers this technical version:
And Yahweh, Elohim, Adam
formed of clay soil;
and He breathed into his nostrils the breath of life,
and Adam became a living soul.
The Hebrew word is translated normally as "soul" is nephesh, that elusive "spirit" that animates the living creature and it looks like the leaves when they die. Not coincidentally, the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament) calls again and again against the shedding of human blood and animal blood meal "because blood is nephesh." The biblical version of creation of Man equivalent, thus nephesh ("spirit," soul ") and blood.
The Old Testament offers another clue about the role of blood in the creation of Man. The term adama (which comes Adam's name) means, originally, not just any earth or soil, but, specifically, dark red soil. Like the Akkadian word adamatu homologous ("dark red soil), the Hebrew word adama and the Hebrew name of the color red (adom) from the words used to describe blood: adatnu, dam. When the book of Genesis names being created by God "the Adam", uses a set of double meaning is very common in the Sumerian language. "The Adam" could mean "the land" (land), "the fact of dark red soil," and "the fact of blood."
The same relationship between the element essential living creatures and there is blood in the Mesopotamian accounts of the creation of Man. That kind of hospital where Ea and the Mother Goddess gave birth to the Man was known Shimti House. Most experts translate it as "the house where the destinations are determined." But the term comes Shimti unequivocally SHI.IM.TI Sumerian, which, taken syllable by syllable, means "breath-wind-life." So Bit Shimti mean literally "the house where the wind of life is blown", which is virtually identical to the biblical statement.
The truth is that the Akkadian word that was used in Mesopotamia to translate the Sumerian SHI.IM.TI was napishtu-the exact counterpart of the biblical term nephesh. And nephesh or napishtu was a "something" elusive in the blood.
Although the Old Testament did not offer many clues Mesopotamian texts were quite explicit on the subject. Not only claimed that blood was needed for the mixture which produced the Man, but also specified that it must be the blood of a god, divine blood.
When the gods decided to create man, their leader announced: "Blood knead, bones will be born." Suggesting that the blood be taken from a specific god, "Let the primitive are forged according to [his] model, "Ea said. By choosing to God,
of its [his] blood, they shaped mankind;
imposing the service, to release the gods ...
work was beyond comprehension. According
epic "When the gods, the gods then called the Birth Goddess (the Mother Goddess, Ninhursag) and asked him to perform work:
While the Birth Goddess is present, the Goddess
Birth forge a progeny.
As Mother of the Gods is present,
the Birth Goddess forge a Lulu;
that the worker has the burden of the gods. To create a Lulu
Amelu,
that he bear the yoke.
In an old Babylonian text called "The Creation of Man by the Mother Goddess," the gods call "The Midwife of the gods, the Business Mari 'and say,
You're the womb-mother, which
Humanity can be created. Create
then to Lulu, which he carried the yoke!
At this point, the text "When the gods" and other parallel texts are immersed in a detailed description of the actual creation of Man. After accepting the "employment", the goddess (called here NIN.TI - "lady who gives life") established some requirements, among whom were some chemicals ("Abzu bitumens), for use in" purification "and" Abzu clay. "
whatever it was these materials, Ea had no trouble understanding the requirements, and accepting, he said,
"will prepare a purifying bath,
that a god is bleeding ...
of its [his] flesh and blood, which Ninti
mix clay. "
But, to shape the man from clay mixed, some support was also needed female, something related to pregnancy and childbirth. Enki offered the services of his wife:
Ninki, my wife-goddess
which will approach the game. Seven
goddesses-of-birth
be close to attend.
After mixing the "blood" and the "clay", the stage of pregnancy and childbirth complete the gift of the "impression" on the creature divine.
The fate of the newborn you will pronounce;
Ninki fixed on him the image of the gods;
and what is he is "Man."
Assyrian seals Some representations may well have been inspired by these texts, showing the Mother Goddess (her symbol was the umbilical cord cutter) and Ea (whose original symbol was the crescent) while preparing mixtures, recite the spells and they encourage each other to continue. (Fig. 151,152)
The involvement of the wife of Enki, Ninki, the creation of the first specimen is not defective Man recalls the story of Adapa, the which we raised in an earlier chapter:
In those days, in those years,
the Sage of Eridu, Ea,
created it as a model for men.
Experts have speculated that references to Adapa as "son" of Ea implied that God loved this man to the point of adoption. But in the same text, Anu regards Adapa as "the human offspring of Enki." It seems that the involvement of the wife of Enki in the process of creating Adapa, the "Adam model", generated some sort of genealogical relationship between the new man and his god, but it was Ninki that Adapa was pregnant! Ninti
blessed the new being and submitted to Ea. Some stamps show the goddess, flanked by the Tree of Life and laboratory flasks, holding to be newborn. (Fig. 153)
Being well bred, to which they refer over and again in the Mesopotamian texts as a "model man" or a "mold" was, apparently, the creature right, for the gods then began to require duplicate. However, this detail, which seems to have no importance, not only sheds light on the process by which "created" to humanity, but the information would otherwise conflict, which appears in the Bible.
According to the first chapter of Genesis:
Elohim created Adam in His image-
the image of God He created him.
Male and female He created them.
Chapter 5, which is called the Book of the Genealogies of Adam, said:
the day that Elohim created Adam, the likeness of Elohim
He did.
Male and female He created them,
and blessed them and called them "Adam"
on the same day of its creation.
In the same sentence, we are told that the Deity created in His image and likeness, only a single being, "the Adam" and then says, in apparent contradiction, that both male and female, were created simultaneously. And the contradictions seem more acute in the second chapter of Genesis, which is what, specifically, tells us that Adam was only for a while, until the Deity made him sleep and developed a Woman from his rib.
This contradiction has puzzled scholars and theologians over the centuries, disappears when we realize that the biblical texts were a condensation of the original Sumerian sources. These sources tell us that, after trying to forge a Primitive Worker "mixing" hominids with animals, the gods came to the conclusion that the only mixture that would work would be the same hominid Nephilim. After several unsuccessful attempts, it became a "model" -Adapa/Adán. At first there was only one Adam.
In the time Adapa / Adam proved to be the right child, it was used as a genetic model or "template" for creating duplicates, duplicates and those were not only males, but males and females. Corno already said, the "rib" Biblical Women which was forged was a pun on the Sumerian term T ("rib" and "life")-confirming that Eve was made from the "essence of life" Adam.
Mesopotamian texts provide us with an eyewitness report about the first production of the duplicate of Adam.
instructions were followed Enki. In Shimti House, where the breath of life "was breathed" - Enki, the Mother Goddess and fourteen birth goddesses met. We obtained the "essence" of a god, he prepared the "purifying bath." "Ea cleaned the clay before him, he kept reciting the incantation."
The god who purifies napishtu, Ea, spoke aloud.
Sitting in front of her, he gave directions to her.
After reciting the incantation,
she removed her hand from clay.
And now we get to both the detailed process of mass creation of Man. With fourteen birth goddesses present
Ninti
pinched fourteen pieces of clay deposited
seven to the right,
deposited seven to the left.
Among them put the mold.
... her hair ...
... umbilical cord cutter.
is clear that the birth goddesses were divided into two groups. "The wise and learned, two times seven birth goddesses had assembled" the text goes on to explain. In their wombs the Mother Goddess deposited the "clay mixed." There are glimpses of surgery, the removal or shaving of hair, the preparation of a surgical instrument, a cutter. Now, there was no wait:
The birth goddesses were kept together. Ninti
sat counting the months.
The fateful 10 th month was approaching;
reached the 10 th month;
the period for the initiation of the womb had elapsed.
Her face radiated understanding:
covered her head, held obstetrics.
waist was girded, and blessed.
She pulled out a form, in the mold was life.
seems that the drama of the creation of Man was made with a subsequent birth. The "mixture" of "clay" and "blood" was used to cause two separate pregnancies in fourteen goddesses of birth. But nine months passed and the tenth month began. "The period for the initiation of the womb had elapsed." Understanding I had to do, the Mother Goddess' held obstetrics. " In a parallel text (despite being fragmented) is seen more clearly that the Mother Goddess had to resort to some type of surgery:
Ninti ... account of the months ...
Al called for 10 th month, the Lady Whose Hand
Opens arrived.
With ... she opened the uterus.
His face shone with joy.
His head was covered;
... made an opening;
what was left in the uterus.
Overwhelmed with joy, the Mother Goddess let out a scream.
"I've created!
My hands have done! "
How was the creation of Man?
In the text "When the gods" is a passage aimed at explaining why the "blood" of a god had to mix with the "clay." The "divine" element required was not the dripping blood of a god, but something more basic and durable. The god who was selected, we have had TE.E.MA-a term that the leading authorities on the text (WG Lambert and AR Millard, University of Oxford) translate as "personality." But the old term is much more specific, it literally means "that which houses that which binds the memory." And What's more, the same term appears in the Akkadian version as etemu, which translates as "spirit."
In both cases, it is "something" in the blood of the god who was the repository of their individuality. We have the certainty that all this were nothing more than different ways to say what he wanted Ea, when he submitted the blood of God to a series of "purifying bath-ers" were the genes of God.
also explains the purpose of the mixture of the divine element in the Earth:
In the clay, God and Man be attached, the unit
brought together;
so until the end of days
the body and spirit
that has matured into a god-
that Soul in a blood relationship is bound, as their signal
proclaim life. So this
not forget,
the "Soul" in a blood relationship is bound.
are strong words, but little understood by scholars. The text states that God's blood mixed into the clay so tied to God and Man genetically "to the end of days", so that the flesh ("image") and soul ("likeness") the gods would be printed on Man in a kinship of blood that can never be broken.
"Epic of Gilgamesh" said that when the gods decided to create a double for Gilgamesh partly divine, the Mother Goddess mixed "clay" with the "essence" of the god Ninurta. Later in the text, the mythical power of Enkidu has been attributed to it the "essence of Anu ', an item purchased through Ninurta, grandson of Anu.
kisir
The Akkadian word refers to an "essence", a "concentration" possessed by the gods of heaven. E. Ebeling summed up his efforts to understand the exact meaning of kisir stating that as "essence, or some other nuance of the term, could well be applied to the deities, as well as projectiles Heaven. " EA Speiser agreed that the word also meant "something that came down from heaven," and said it had a connotation of "as if it were appropriate to use the term in contexts related to medicine." We again
one simple word in the translation: gen.
Evidence of ancient texts, both Mesopotamian and biblical, suggest that the process adopted to mix the two sets of genes-those of a god and those of Homo erectus, involved the use of male and divine element genes and gene Earth as a female.
After repeating once again that the Deity created Adam in His image and likeness, the Book of Genesis records after the birth of Seth, the son of Adam, with the following words:
And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years and was a descendant
his likeness and in his image ;
and named him Seth.
The terminology is identical to that used to describe the creation of Adam by the Deity. But Seth was certainly the son of Adam as a biological-fertilization of a female egg with male sperm of Adam, resulting in conception, pregnancy and childbirth. Identical terminology speaks of an identical process, and the only conclusion is also plausible that Adam was begotten of the Deity through the process of fertilizing a female egg with the sperm of a god.
If the "clay", which mixed the divine element, was an Earth-like every word they say, then the only possible conclusion is that the male sperm of a god-its genetic material - was inserted into the egg of a female ape!
The Akkadian term for "clay" or, rather, "Molding Clay" - is tit. But his original spelling was TI.IT ("that which is alive"). In Hebrew, tit means "mud," but its synonym is to be, it shares roots with Colombia ("swamp") and Bea ("egg").
The Creation story is full of puns. We have seen double and triple meaning of Adam adama-adamtu-dam. The epithet for the Mother Goddess, NIN.TI, which means both "lady of life" as "lady of the rib." Why not then bo-bia-bea ("clay-mud-egg") as a pun for the female egg?
The egg of a female Oven erectus, fertilized by the genes of a god, then implanted in the uterus of the wife of Ea, and, after obtaining the "model" is implemented duplicate this in the wombs of the birth goddesses, to undergo the process of pregnancy and childbirth.
The scholars,
two times seven birth goddesses had assembled;
fathered seven men, seven
bred females.
begat The Birth Goddess
Wind Breath of Life.
In pairs were they completed,
in pairs were completed in her presence.
The creatures were People-
Creatures of the Mother Goddess. Homo sapiens
had been created.
legends and ancient myths, the biblical data and modern science are also consistent in one aspect. As the findings of modern anthropologists-that Man evolved and emerged in southeastern Africa, the text-s Mesopotamian suggest that the creation of Man took place in the Apsu, in the Lower World, where he was the Land of Mines. Along with Adapa, the "model" of Man, some texts mention the "sacred love, the woman of the earth", whose abode was in the Apsu.
The text of "The Creation of Man", Enki gives the following instructions to the Mother Goddess: "Mix to a core the clay from the foundations of the earth, just above the Abzu." In a hymn to the creations of Ea, "the Apsu modeled as their home", it says:
The divine Ea in the Apsu
took a pinch of clay, Kulla
created to restore the temples.
The hymn continues making a list of specialists in construction, as well as those responsible for "the abundant products of the mountain and the sea" that were created by Ea-all, be inferred from bits of "clay "nipped in the Abzu-the Land of Mines in the Lower World.
The texts make it abundantly clear that, although Ea built a brick house by the water in Eridu, the Abzu built a house adorned with silver and precious stones. It was there that his creature, Man, had its origin:
AB.ZU The Lord of the king Enki ...
built his house of silver and lapis lazuli;
silver and lapis lazuli, like sparkling light, the Father
conveniently forged in AB.ZU.
Creatures bright countenance, emerging from AB.ZU
,
stood the Lord everywhere Nudimmud.
One can conclude, from the various texts that the creation of Man caused a split among the gods. It appears that at least initially, the new Primitive Workers were restricted to the Land of Mines. As a result, the Anunnaki who were working hard at the same Sumer were denied benefits of the new workforce. A baffling text that scholars call "The Myth of the Piquette" is, in fact, the chronicle of events by which Sumer Anunnaki who were under the command of Enlil got their fair share of Black-Headed People. Trying to restore
"normal order" Enlil took an extreme decision: to cut the contact between the Sky "(the Twelfth Planet or spacecraft) and the Earth, and launched a drastic action against the place" where gushing flesh. "
Lord, what is appropriate
made it happen.
The Lord Enlil, whose decisions were unchanged
,
rushed to separate truly heaven on Earth for Created
could leave;
really rushed to separate the earth from Heaven.
In the "Bond Heaven-Earth" made a cut,
for Created
could rise from the Place-Where-Flesh-Brot.
Against the 'Country of Piquette and Cart ", a weapon forged Enlil AL.A.NI wonderful call (' ax that generates power"). This weapon had a "tooth" that "as a one-horned ox," could attack and destroy large walls. According to the descriptions, must be a kind of giant drill, mounted on a kind of bulldozer that crushed everything to be put forward:
The house which rebels against the Lord,
the house who does not submit to the Lord, makes
the AL.A.NI submit to the Lord.
of evil ... heads crushing plants;
start until the root breaks to the top. Armando
your device with a 'scraper earth, "launched its attack Enlil:
The Lord make the AL.A.NI, gave his orders.
put the Earth ripper crown on his head,
and put him in the Place-Where-Flesh-Brot.
In the hole was the head of a man
from the ground, people made its way towards Enlil.
He looked at his Cabezas Determined-looking black.
started, the Anunnaki made their applications before the arrival of the Primitive Workers and lost no time in putting them to work:
The Anunnaki went up to him,
raised their hands to receive it,
the heart of Enlil appeased with prayers. Blackheads
asked.
A Black-headed people,
made them take the pickaxe.
Similarly, the Book of Genesis conveys the information that "Adam" was created in an area west of Mesopotamia, to then be taken to the east to Mesopotamia, to work in the garden of Eden:
And the Deity Yahweh
planted a garden in Eden in the East ...
and took the
and put Adam in the Garden of Eden
to till it and keep it.
See http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sitchin/planeta12/12planet_12.htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment